The media
is making a big deal of Michael Cohen's claim that Donald Trump had advance
notice of the Don Junior's meeting with the Russian lawyer, Natalia
Veselnitskaya. The media talk about
this meeting as if it was treasonous. I
don't think it was even improper. What
if the Russians were going to tell Trump that Hillary had given classified
information to a Russian spy? Wouldn't
it make sense to see what the Russians were going to say? If the Russians were going to offer $1
million to the Trump campaign, the Trumps could have refused it. I don't see what's wrong with listening to
what the Russians had to say as long as the Trumps did not act on any illegal
proposals.
The media's efforts to
portray this meeting as treasonous are just part of the Democratic Party's
effort to invalidate the election and remove Trump from the Presidency. If it's not an illegal meeting, then it doesn't
matter whether Trump had advance notice of it or not, even if he has denied he
knew about it beforehand. Therefore,
Cohen's claim is irrelevant. It just
gives the press an opportunity to bring up the meeting again and slander
Trump's connection to it. It's another
illustration of how partisan the press is whether it's "fake news" or
not.
No comments:
Post a Comment